[theme_section_hidden_section.ReportAbuse1] : Plus UI currently doesn't support ReportAbuse gadget added from Layout. Consider reporting about this message to the admin of this blog. Looks like you are the admin of this blog, remove this widget from Layout to hide this message.
The FRBM Act, enacted in 2003 and effective from 2004, aimed to promote financial discipline and support economic stability in India. It marked a shift from yearly budgeting to a long-term fiscal planning approach. The main objectives and rules under the Act include:
Reducing Revenue Deficit:
Reducing Fiscal Deficit:
Exceptions:
Each financial year, the government must present three key financial policy documents:
The Act requires projections for the following indicators in the Medium-Term Financial Policy Statement:
The FRBM Act was designed to ensure responsible fiscal policies, reduce government debt, and strengthen India's economic foundation. It also promotes transparency and accountability in public finances.
In 2012-13, the FRBM Act was amended with some important changes:
Expenditure Reforms:
Effective Revenue Deficit:
It introduced the concept of Effective Revenue Deficit, which excludes grants given to states for building infrastructure (capital assets) from the regular revenue deficit calculation.
Goal:
In simpler terms, the amendment made the government's spending and deficit planning more focused by removing certain types of spending (capital grants) from the regular deficit calculations.
Let me explain it more simply:
In the original revenue deficit calculation, all types of government spending (including grants to states) were considered. However, some of this spending, like grants given to states for building things like roads, schools, or hospitals (known as capital assets), is an investment that helps grow the economy in the long term.
So, in the Effective Revenue Deficit calculation, the government decided to exclude these types of grants because they are meant for future growth, not just regular spending. This helps to give a clearer picture of the government’s actual ongoing financial health, focusing on how much it is spending on regular operations, rather than long-term investments.
In short, the change was made to show a more accurate measure of the government's current financial condition by removing long-term investment spending.
Here are the key recommendations of the N.K. Singh Committee (2016-2017) in single-line points: