Home
Polity-Mains-PYQ

Discuss India as a secular state and compare with the secular principles of the US Constitution

Amith

✅ Question (GS Paper II – 2024):

"Discuss India as a secular state and compare with the secular principles of the US Constitution."
(15 marks, approx. 250 words expected)

1. Keyword-Based Analysis

  • Directive Word: Discuss → Requires explanation and analysis (not just listing), including examples.

  • Keyword 1: India as a secular state → Explain the nature, constitutional basis, and practice.

  • Keyword 2: Compare with secular principles of US Constitution → Identify similarities/differences in intent, execution, and interpretation.

2. Demand of the Question

  • Define secularism and its significance in a constitutional democracy.

  • Explain the Indian model of secularism with constitutional references.

  • Compare with the US model, especially in terms of:

    • Church–state relationship

    • Religious freedom

    • Judicial interpretation

  • Critically highlight strengths and challenges in both systems.

3. Ideal Answer Structure

Introduction

  • Briefly define secularism: separation of religion from state affairs and equal treatment of all religions.

  • Mention that both India and the USA are secular democracies but follow distinct secular models.

Body

A. India as a Secular State

  • Constitutional Provisions:

    • Preamble: "Secular"

    • Articles 25–28: Right to freedom of religion

    • Article 14, 15: Equality before law and prohibition of religious discrimination

  • Nature of Secularism:

    • Principled distance from all religions

    • State can intervene in religious matters for reform (e.g., Triple Talaq, Sabarimala)

    • Positive secularism – promotes religious harmony and reform while respecting faith

B. US Model of Secularism

  • Based on strict separation of church and state

  • First Amendment: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”

  • Negative secularism – state stays completely away from religion

  • No government funding or involvement in religious activities

C. Comparison Table

Feature India United States
Constitutional Basis Preamble, Articles 14, 25–28 First Amendment
Model Positive secularism (multi-faith) Negative secularism (strict separation)
Role of State Can intervene in religion (reforms) Cannot promote or interfere at all
Religious Expression Allowed in public sphere Restricted in public institutions
Judiciary Active in regulating religious practices Active in protecting free exercise

Conclusion

While both countries uphold secularism as a democratic ideal, India’s model accommodates religious pluralism through regulation, whereas the US model ensures liberty through complete separation. Each reflects the historical and cultural ethos of its society. Both face challenges in balancing religious freedom with constitutional morality.

4. Model Answer (Approx. 200 Words)

Secularism, as a constitutional principle, ensures the state maintains neutrality in matters of religion. India and the United States, though both secular, adopt contrasting approaches rooted in their historical experiences.

The Indian Constitution declares India a "secular" republic (Preamble) and guarantees freedom of religion under Articles 25 to 28. Indian secularism is positive in nature, aiming for equal respect to all religions while allowing the state to intervene in religious practices for reform and social justice. For example, judicial intervention in Triple Talaq and untouchability showcases this proactive role.

In contrast, the US Constitution, through the First Amendment, follows a strict separation model. The state cannot establish, fund, or interfere in religious affairs. This negative secularism ensures religious liberty by keeping state and religion in distinct domains.

While India embraces religious pluralism, the US emphasizes individual liberty from state-imposed religion. However, challenges exist in both models—India faces issues of politicization and communal tensions, whereas the US grapples with religious symbolism in public spaces and policy influence from faith-based groups.

Thus, while both uphold secularism, they differ in scope, state involvement, and legal interpretation, shaped by socio-cultural diversity and constitutional philosophy.

5. Value Addition Tips

  • Quote:

    • "Secularism is not anti-religion, it is pro-equality." – N.A. Palkhivala

  • Constitutional Provisions:

    • India: Articles 14, 15, 25–28

    • USA: First Amendment to the Constitution

  • Case Laws:

    • S.R. Bommai v Union of India (India) – Secularism as a basic feature

    • Everson v Board of Education (US) – Defined church-state separation

  • Recent Examples:

    • India: Hijab row, Uniform Civil Code debates

    • USA: Religious exemptions in vaccination mandates

6. Common Mistakes

  • Confusing “equal respect to all religions” with “no religious role in public life”

  • Ignoring constitutional and historical contexts

  • Overgeneralizing one model as superior

  • Missing recent examples or court judgments

Post a Comment