[theme_section_hidden_section.ReportAbuse1] : Plus UI currently doesn't support ReportAbuse gadget added from Layout. Consider reporting about this message to the admin of this blog. Looks like you are the admin of this blog, remove this widget from Layout to hide this message.
The Continental Drift Theory is a foundational concept in geology, proposing that Earth's continents have not always been in their current positions but have drifted over geological time. This revolutionary idea was first presented by the German meteorologist Alfred Wegener in 1912. His hypothesis marked a significant departure from the static Earth models of the past, introducing the concept of a dynamic and evolving planet.
Wegener's Continental Drift Theory suggested that all the continents were once part of a single massive supercontinent called Pangaea, which existed around 300 million years ago during the late Paleozoic and early Mesozoic eras. Over time, Pangaea began to break apart into two large landmasses: Laurasia in the northern hemisphere and Gondwana in the southern hemisphere. These eventually fragmented further into the continents we see today.
Wegener proposed that the continents are composed of lighter sialic (silicon and aluminum-rich) rocks, which "float" on the denser, basaltic simatic (silicon and magnesium-rich) rocks of the ocean floor. This drift occurs over millions of years, driven by forces initially hypothesized by Wegener but later refined with the advent of plate tectonics.
Alfred Wegener (1880-1930) was not a geologist but a meteorologist and polar researcher. Despite his background, his interdisciplinary approach enabled him to observe geological, paleontological, and climatological data holistically. His groundbreaking work, "The Origin of Continents and Oceans" (1915), detailed his theory, compiling evidence from multiple scientific fields. Unfortunately, Wegener faced substantial opposition from the geological community due to his inability to explain the precise mechanisms behind continental movement. Nevertheless, his persistence laid the groundwork for future scientific breakthroughs.
Wegener proposed several mechanisms to explain continental drift, though they were later deemed insufficient:
Pole-fleeing Force (Centrifugal Force): Due to the Earth's rotation, a centrifugal force acts outward from the Earth's axis, pushing landmasses away from the poles toward the equator. However, this force was too weak to account for the vast movement of continents.
Tidal Forces: He speculated that gravitational interactions between the Earth, Moon, and Sun created tidal forces strong enough to drag continents across the ocean floor. This explanation was flawed because tidal forces affect the Earth uniformly and lack the differential impact required to move continents.
Buoyancy and Gravitational Forces: Wegener hinted at buoyancy forces due to differences in density between continental and oceanic crust, but he couldn't fully articulate this idea.
Modern geology explains these movements through plate tectonics, driven by:
Read detailed UPSC mains 2018 Answer for Evidence Supporting CDT
Wegener amassed compelling evidence from various scientific disciplines:
Jigsaw Fit of Continents: The complementary shapes of continental coastlines, especially the near-perfect fit between South America and Africa, suggested they were once joined.
Fossil Evidence: Identical fossils of species like Mesosaurus (a freshwater reptile), Glossopteris (a fern-like plant), and Lystrosaurus (a land reptile) were found on continents now separated by vast oceans, indicating these continents were once connected.
Geological Evidence: Similar rock types, mountain ranges, and geological structures were discovered on different continents. For example:
Paleoclimatic Evidence: Evidence of past climatic conditions that do not align with current continental positions includes:
Distribution of Earthquakes and Volcanoes: While Wegener didn't use this as evidence, the global patterns of seismic and volcanic activity align with tectonic plate boundaries, supporting his theory indirectly.
The Continental Drift Theory was revolutionary despite initial criticism. Its significance includes:
Continental Drift Theory: UPSC Previous Year Questions (PYQs)
Continental Drift Theory: FAQs
Who proposed the Continental Drift Theory?
What is Pangaea?
Why was Wegener's theory initially rejected?
How is the Continental Drift Theory different from Plate Tectonics?
What is the current status of the Continental Drift Theory?
What is Laurasia and Gondwana?
Conclusion
The Continental Drift Theory marked a paradigm shift in geological sciences. Although initially controversial, it paved the way for the acceptance of plate tectonics, fundamentally altering our understanding of Earth's dynamic nature. For UPSC aspirants, a thorough grasp of this theory is essential, as it frequently features in General Studies Paper I under the Geography section. Its interdisciplinary connections with climatology, paleontology, and seismology make it a cornerstone topic for both static and dynamic portions of the UPSC syllabus.